fix: PR merge (#39442)

* Revert the behavior introduced by #30805
* Now the PR status is still managed in Gitea's code where the operation
is triggerred but not in post-receive hook
* Fix #39254 and many more related bugs.
    * Fix #39124

```
// MarkAsMerged sets a pull request to merged and closes the corresponding issue
// To make sure the pull request is marked as merged correctly, the caller uses multiple-stage operations:
//  1. Create a temp repo from base, merge the head into the temp repo, and get the merged commit ID and timestamp,
//  2. The merged commit ID and related information are stored into pull request
//  3. Push the merged commit to the base repo
//  4. Call MarkAsMerged to mark the pull request as merged and do post-processing (notification, close issues, etc)
//
// If failure occurs in step 1/2/3: the pull request is still open, the base repo is not changed, the doer can start a new merge.
// If failure occurs in step 4: the pull request can be marked as merged by the merged commit ID stored in it later.
```
This commit is contained in:
wxiaoguang
2026-09-27 01:38:42 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent dcef88a233
commit ea91028028
20 changed files with 359 additions and 356 deletions
+6 -6
View File
@@ -378,11 +378,11 @@ func TestCantMergeConflict(t *testing.T) {
BaseBranch: "base",
})
err := pull_service.Merge(pr, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleMerge, "", "CONFLICT", false)
err := pull_service.Merge(pr.ID, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleMerge, "", "CONFLICT", false)
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to conflict")
assert.True(t, pull_service.IsErrMergeConflicts(err), "Merge error is not a conflict error")
err = pull_service.Merge(pr, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleRebase, "", "CONFLICT", false)
err = pull_service.Merge(pr.ID, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleRebase, "", "CONFLICT", false)
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to conflict")
assert.True(t, pull_service.IsErrRebaseConflicts(err), "Merge error is not a conflict error")
})
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ func TestCantMergeUnrelated(t *testing.T) {
BaseBranch: "base",
})
err = pull_service.Merge(pr, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleMerge, "", "UNRELATED", false)
err = pull_service.Merge(pr.ID, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleMerge, "", "UNRELATED", false)
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to unrelated")
assert.True(t, pull_service.IsErrMergeUnrelatedHistories(err), "Merge error is not a unrelated histories error")
})
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ func TestFastForwardOnlyMerge(t *testing.T) {
BaseBranch: "master",
})
err := pull_service.Merge(pr, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleFastForwardOnly, "", "FAST-FORWARD-ONLY", false)
err := pull_service.Merge(pr.ID, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleFastForwardOnly, "", "FAST-FORWARD-ONLY", false)
assert.NoError(t, err)
})
}
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ func TestFastForwardOnlyMergeWithRequiredSignedCommits(t *testing.T) {
pb.RequireSignedCommits = false
require.NoError(t, git_model.UpdateProtectBranch(t.Context(), repo1, pb, git_model.WhitelistOptions{}))
require.NoError(t, pull_service.Merge(pr, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleFastForwardOnly, "", "FAST-FORWARD-ONLY", false))
require.NoError(t, pull_service.Merge(pr.ID, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleFastForwardOnly, "", "FAST-FORWARD-ONLY", false))
})
}
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ func TestCantFastForwardOnlyMergeDiverging(t *testing.T) {
BaseBranch: "master",
})
err := pull_service.Merge(pr, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleFastForwardOnly, "", "DIVERGING", false)
err := pull_service.Merge(pr.ID, user1, repo_model.MergeStyleFastForwardOnly, "", "DIVERGING", false)
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to being for a diverging branch")
assert.True(t, pull_service.IsErrMergeDivergingFastForwardOnly(err), "Merge error is not a diverging fast-forward-only error")
})