Purpose:
1. Make the whole code base have unified "item" layout
2. Clarify our "list" styles: "flex-relaxed-list", "flex-divided-list"
3. Prepare to replace legacy "ui relaxed list"
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/37445#discussion_r3144458865
4. Prepare for refactoring the "pull merge box", it needs the
"flex-divided-list"
* related to "Refactor pull request view (*)" like #37451
5. Fix legacy abuses of "flex-list", e.g.: repo home sidebar
Enable
[`sequence.concurrent`](https://vitest.dev/config/sequence.html#sequence-concurrent)
to run all js tests in parallel. This will help catch potential
concurrency bugs in the future. The "Repository Branch Settings" test
was not concurrency-safe, it was refactored to remove shared mutable
state.
Co-Authored-By: Claude (claude-opus-4-6) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude (claude-opus-4-6) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A big step towards enabling strict mode in Typescript.
There was definitely a good share of potential bugs while refactoring
this. When in doubt, I opted to keep the potentially broken behaviour.
Notably, the `DOMEvent` type is gone, it was broken and we're better of
with type assertions on `e.target`.
---------
Signed-off-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes 79 typescript errors. Discovered at least two bugs in
`notifications.ts`, and I'm pretty sure this feature was at least
partially broken and may still be, I don't really know how to test it.
After this, only like ~10 typescript errors remain in the codebase but
those are harder to solve.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Provide a cropping tool on the avatar editing page, allowing users to
select the cropping area themselves. This way, users can decide the
displayed area of the image, rather than us deciding for them.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
## Solves
Currently for rules to re-order them you have to alter the creation
date. so you basicly have to delete and recreate them in the right
order. This is more than just inconvinient ...
## Solution
Add a new col for prioritization
## Demo WebUI Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92182a31-9705-4ac5-b6e3-9bb74108cbd1
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
