all: inline deprecated tailcfg capability aliases

go 1.27 vet reports the //go:fix inline directives tailscale added to
the tailcfg cap aliases; applied with `go fix -inline ./...`.

hscontrol/mapper/mapper.go

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/rs/zerolog/log"
 	"tailscale.com/envknob"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/dnstype"
 	"tailscale.com/types/views"
 )
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ func generateUserProfiles(
 // See https://tailscale.com/docs/integrations/nextdns.
 const (
 	nextDNSAttrPrefix             = "nextdns:"
-	nextDNSAttrNoInfo tailcfg.NodeCapability = "nextdns:no-device-info"
+	nextDNSAttrNoInfo nodecap.Cap = "nextdns:no-device-info"
 )
 
 // nextDNSProfileRE bounds the characters accepted in a `nextdns:<profile>`

hscontrol/mapper/tail_test.go

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
 	"tailscale.com/net/tsaddr"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/key"
 )
 
@@ -74,10 +75,10 @@ func TestTailNode(t *testing.T) {
 				MachineAuthorized: true,
 
 				CapMap: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-					tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing:     []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.FileSharing:       []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: []tailcfg.RawMessage{tailcfg.RawMessage("false")},
+					nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: []tailcfg.RawMessage{tailcfg.RawMessage("false")},
 				},
 			},
 			wantErr: false,
@@ -163,10 +164,10 @@ func TestTailNode(t *testing.T) {
 				MachineAuthorized: true,
 
 				CapMap: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-					tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing:     []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.FileSharing:       []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: []tailcfg.RawMessage{tailcfg.RawMessage("false")},
+					nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: []tailcfg.RawMessage{tailcfg.RawMessage("false")},
 				},
 			},
 			wantErr: false,
@@ -188,10 +189,10 @@ func TestTailNode(t *testing.T) {
 				MachineAuthorized: true,
 
 				CapMap: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-					tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing:     []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+					nodecap.FileSharing:       []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: []tailcfg.RawMessage{tailcfg.RawMessage("false")},
+					nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: []tailcfg.RawMessage{tailcfg.RawMessage("false")},
 				},
 			},
 			wantErr: false,
@@ -274,10 +275,10 @@ func TestTailNodeBaselineGates(t *testing.T) {
 				AutoUpdate: types.AutoUpdateConfig{Enabled: false},
 			},
 			want: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing:     []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.FileSharing:       []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(false),
+				nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(false),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -287,9 +288,9 @@ func TestTailNodeBaselineGates(t *testing.T) {
 				AutoUpdate: types.AutoUpdateConfig{Enabled: false},
 			},
 			want: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(false),
+				nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(false),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -299,10 +300,10 @@ func TestTailNodeBaselineGates(t *testing.T) {
 				AutoUpdate: types.AutoUpdateConfig{Enabled: true},
 			},
 			want: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing:     []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.FileSharing:       []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(true),
+				nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(true),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -312,9 +313,9 @@ func TestTailNodeBaselineGates(t *testing.T) {
 				AutoUpdate: types.AutoUpdateConfig{Enabled: true},
 			},
 			want: tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin:           []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.Admin:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:             []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+				nodecap.SSH:               []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-				tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(true),
+				nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate: autoUpdate(true),
 			},
 		},
 	}
@@ -351,7 +352,7 @@ func TestTailNodeBaselineGates(t *testing.T) {
 func TestTailNodeDisableIPv4(t *testing.T) {
 	t.Parallel()
 
-	const NodeAttrDisableIPv4 tailcfg.NodeCapability = "disable-ipv4"
+	const NodeAttrDisableIPv4 nodecap.Cap = "disable-ipv4"
 
 	v4 := iap("100.64.0.1")
 	v6Addr := netip.MustParseAddr("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1")

hscontrol/policy/matcher/matcher_test.go

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 )
 
 func TestMatchFromStrings(t *testing.T) {
@@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ func TestMatchFromFilterRule(t *testing.T) {
 							netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.3/32"),
 						},
 						CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-							tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay: nil,
+							peercap.Relay: nil,
 						},
 					},
 				},
@@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ func TestMatchFromFilterRule(t *testing.T) {
 							netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.2/32"),
 						},
 						CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-							tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget: nil,
+							peercap.RelayTarget: nil,
 						},
 					},
 				},
@@ -242,7 +243,7 @@ func TestMatchFromFilterRule(t *testing.T) {
 							netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.3/32"),
 						},
 						CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-							tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay: nil,
+							peercap.Relay: nil,
 						},
 					},
 				},

hscontrol/policy/v2/compiled.go

@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ import (
 	"github.com/rs/zerolog/log"
 	"go4.org/netipx"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/views"
 	"tailscale.com/util/set"
 )
@@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ func (pol *Policy) compileNodeAttrs(
 	}
 
 	result := make(map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap)
-	stamp := func(id types.NodeID, attr tailcfg.NodeCapability) {
+	stamp := func(id types.NodeID, attr nodecap.Cap) {
 		capMap, ok := result[id]
 		if !ok {
 			capMap = tailcfg.NodeCapMap{}
@@ -190,7 +192,7 @@ func (pol *Policy) compileNodeAttrs(
 
 	if pol.RandomizeClientPort {
 		for _, ni := range nodeList {
-			stamp(ni.id, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort)
+			stamp(ni.id, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort)
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -598,7 +600,7 @@ func collectRelayTargetIPs(grants []compiledGrant) (*netipx.IPSet, error) {
 	for i := range grants {
 		for _, rule := range grants[i].rules {
 			for _, cg := range rule.CapGrant {
-				if _, ok := cg.CapMap[tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay]; !ok {
+				if _, ok := cg.CapMap[peercap.Relay]; !ok {
 					continue
 				}
 

hscontrol/policy/v2/filter.go

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/rs/zerolog/log"
 	"go4.org/netipx"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/views"
 )
 
@@ -24,8 +25,8 @@ var (
 // companionCap pairs a well-known Tailscale capability with its
 // companion capability.
 type companionCap struct {
-	original  tailcfg.PeerCapability
+	original  peercap.Cap
-	companion tailcfg.PeerCapability
+	companion peercap.Cap
 }
 
 // companionCaps lists certain well-known Tailscale capabilities and
@@ -35,8 +36,8 @@ type companionCap struct {
 // The slice is ordered by the original capability name so that
 // generated companion rules are emitted deterministically.
 var companionCaps = []companionCap{
-	{tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer},
+	{peercap.Taildrive, peercap.TaildriveSharer},
-	{tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget},
+	{peercap.Relay, peercap.RelayTarget},
 }
 
 // companionCapGrantRules returns additional [tailcfg.FilterRule]s for any

hscontrol/policy/v2/filter_test.go

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"go4.org/netipx"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 )
 
 // aliasWithPorts creates an AliasWithPorts structure from an alias and ports.
@@ -3166,7 +3167,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 			dstIPStrings: []string{"100.64.0.1"},
 			srcPrefixes:  []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.2/32")},
 			capMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-				tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
+				peercap.Taildrive: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
 			},
 			want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
 				{
@@ -3175,7 +3176,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 						{
 							Dsts: []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.2/32")},
 							CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-								tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer: nil,
+								peercap.TaildriveSharer: nil,
 							},
 						},
 					},
@@ -3187,7 +3188,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 			dstIPStrings: []string{"100.64.0.10"},
 			srcPrefixes:  []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.20/32")},
 			capMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-				tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
+				peercap.Relay: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
 			},
 			want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
 				{
@@ -3196,7 +3197,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 						{
 							Dsts: []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.20/32")},
 							CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-								tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget: nil,
+								peercap.RelayTarget: nil,
 							},
 						},
 					},
@@ -3208,8 +3209,8 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 			dstIPStrings: []string{"100.64.0.1"},
 			srcPrefixes:  []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.2/32")},
 			capMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-				tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay:     {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
+				peercap.Relay:     {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
-				tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
+				peercap.Taildrive: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
 			},
 			want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
 				{
@@ -3219,7 +3220,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 						{
 							Dsts: []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.2/32")},
 							CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-								tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer: nil,
+								peercap.TaildriveSharer: nil,
 							},
 						},
 					},
@@ -3230,7 +3231,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 						{
 							Dsts: []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.2/32")},
 							CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-								tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget: nil,
+								peercap.RelayTarget: nil,
 							},
 						},
 					},
@@ -3251,7 +3252,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 			dstIPStrings: []string{"100.64.0.5"},
 			srcPrefixes:  []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.6/32")},
 			capMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-				tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive: {
+				peercap.Taildrive: {
 					tailcfg.RawMessage(`{"access":"rw"}`),
 				},
 			},
@@ -3262,7 +3263,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 						{
 							Dsts: []netip.Prefix{mp("100.64.0.6/32")},
 							CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-								tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer: nil,
+								peercap.TaildriveSharer: nil,
 							},
 						},
 					},
@@ -3280,7 +3281,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 				mp("100.64.0.21/32"),
 			},
 			capMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-				tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
+				peercap.Relay: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
 			},
 			want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
 				{
@@ -3292,7 +3293,7 @@ func TestCompanionCapGrantRules(t *testing.T) {
 								mp("100.64.0.21/32"),
 							},
 							CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-								tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget: nil,
+								peercap.RelayTarget: nil,
 							},
 						},
 					},
@@ -3805,7 +3806,7 @@ func TestCompileViaGrant(t *testing.T) {
 				Sources:      Aliases{up("testuser@")},
 				Destinations: Aliases{pp("10.0.0.0/24")},
 				App: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-					tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
+					peercap.Relay: {tailcfg.RawMessage(`{}`)},
 				},
 				Via: []Tag{"tag:relay"},
 			},

hscontrol/policy/v2/nodeattrs_test.go

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 )
 
 // nodeAttrsTestUsers returns a minimal user set: two passkey-style users on
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ const nodeAttrsTagOwners = `"tag:server": ["alice@example.com"],
 func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 	t.Parallel()
 
-	capMap := func(c tailcfg.NodeCapability) tailcfg.NodeCapMap {
+	capMap := func(c nodecap.Cap) tailcfg.NodeCapMap {
 		return tailcfg.NodeCapMap{c: nil}
 	}
 
@@ -95,18 +96,18 @@ func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 			name:  "wildcard target hits every node",
 			extra: `"nodeAttrs": [{"target": ["*"], "attr": ["randomize-client-port"]}]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				1: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				1: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				2: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				2: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				3: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				3: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				4: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				4: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				5: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				5: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 			},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "user target hits only that user's untagged nodes",
 			extra: `"nodeAttrs": [{"target": ["alice@example.com"], "attr": ["randomize-client-port"]}]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				1: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				1: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -114,8 +115,8 @@ func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 			extra: `"nodeAttrs": [{"target": ["tag:server"], "attr": ["drive:share", "drive:access"]}]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
 				3: {
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveShare:  nil,
+					nodecap.TaildriveShare:  nil,
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess: nil,
+					nodecap.TaildriveAccess: nil,
 				},
 			},
 		},
@@ -123,17 +124,17 @@ func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 			name:  "autogroup:member hits untagged nodes only",
 			extra: `"nodeAttrs": [{"target": ["autogroup:member"], "attr": ["randomize-client-port"]}]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				1: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				1: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				2: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				2: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 			},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "autogroup:tagged hits tagged nodes only",
 			extra: `"nodeAttrs": [{"target": ["autogroup:tagged"], "attr": ["disable-captive-portal-detection"]}]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				3: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection),
+				3: capMap(nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection),
-				4: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection),
+				4: capMap(nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection),
-				5: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection),
+				5: capMap(nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -143,14 +144,14 @@ func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 				{"target": ["tag:server"], "attr": ["drive:share"]}
 			]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				1: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess),
+				1: capMap(nodecap.TaildriveAccess),
-				2: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess),
+				2: capMap(nodecap.TaildriveAccess),
 				3: {
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess: nil,
+					nodecap.TaildriveAccess: nil,
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveShare:  nil,
+					nodecap.TaildriveShare:  nil,
 				},
-				4: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess),
+				4: capMap(nodecap.TaildriveAccess),
-				5: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess),
+				5: capMap(nodecap.TaildriveAccess),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -162,11 +163,11 @@ func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 			name:  "top-level randomizeClientPort stamps every node",
 			extra: `"randomizeClientPort": true`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				1: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				1: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				2: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				2: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				3: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				3: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				4: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				4: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				5: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				5: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -174,14 +175,14 @@ func TestNodeAttrsCompile(t *testing.T) {
 			extra: `"randomizeClientPort": true,
 				"nodeAttrs": [{"target": ["tag:server"], "attr": ["disable-captive-portal-detection"]}]`,
 			want: map[types.NodeID]tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-				1: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				1: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				2: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				2: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 				3: {
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort:           nil,
+					nodecap.RandomizeClientPort:           nil,
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection: nil,
+					nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection: nil,
 				},
-				4: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				4: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
-				5: capMap(tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+				5: capMap(nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 			},
 		},
 	}

hscontrol/policy/v2/tailnet_state_caps.go

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import (
 
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 )
 
 // PeerCapMap returns the subset of peerSelfCaps the Tailscale client
@@ -47,12 +48,12 @@ func PeerCapMap(peer types.NodeView, peerSelfCaps tailcfg.NodeCapMap) tailcfg.No
 	// the suggestion from following an advertised-but-not-yet-trusted
 	// node.
 	if peer.IsExitNode() {
-		if v, ok := peerSelfCaps[tailcfg.NodeAttrSuggestExitNode]; ok {
+		if v, ok := peerSelfCaps[nodecap.SuggestExitNode]; ok {
 			if out == nil {
 				out = tailcfg.NodeCapMap{}
 			}
 
-			out[tailcfg.NodeAttrSuggestExitNode] = v
+			out[nodecap.SuggestExitNode] = v
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ func PeerCapMap(peer types.NodeView, peerSelfCaps tailcfg.NodeCapMap) tailcfg.No
 //     anonymized capture.
 //  4. Caps that are internal magicsock or embedded-SSH tuning with no
 //     headscale-side equivalent.
-var unmodelledTailnetStateCaps = []tailcfg.NodeCapability{
+var unmodelledTailnetStateCaps = []nodecap.Cap{
 	// --- 1. User-role gated ---
 
 	// [tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin]: the hosted control plane stamps this
@@ -80,13 +81,13 @@ var unmodelledTailnetStateCaps = []tailcfg.NodeCapability{
 	// the always-on baseline. Stripping on both sides keeps the diff
 	// from failing on every user-owned non-admin node in a capture.
 	// Long-term fix is autogroup:admin support.
-	tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin,
+	nodecap.Admin,
 
 	// [tailcfg.CapabilityOwner]: same shape as is-admin, conditional
 	// on the "owner" role rather than admin. Headscale does not emit
 	// this cap at all. autogroup:owner support is tracked under
 	// NO_USER_ROLES — see the compat skip list.
-	tailcfg.CapabilityOwner,
+	nodecap.Owner,
 
 	// --- 2. Feature not implemented ---
 
@@ -95,23 +96,23 @@ var unmodelledTailnetStateCaps = []tailcfg.NodeCapability{
 	// re-keying by the control plane. Client reads at
 	// ipn/ipnlocal/local.go:1752 (b.capTailnetLock). Headscale has no
 	// tailnet-lock implementation.
-	tailcfg.CapabilityTailnetLock,
+	nodecap.TailnetLock,
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrServiceHost]: marks a node as approved to host
 	// VIP services (Tailscale Services). Client reads via
 	// UnmarshalNodeCapViewJSON at ipn/ipnlocal/local.go:2704.
 	// Headscale does not implement Tailscale Services.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrServiceHost,
+	nodecap.ServiceHost,
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrStoreAppCRoutes]: tells an app-connector node
 	// to persist learned routes across restarts. Client reads via
 	// controlknobs:148. Headscale does not implement app connectors.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrStoreAppCRoutes,
+	nodecap.StoreAppCRoutes,
 
 	// [tailcfg.CapabilityWarnFunnelNoHTTPS]: deprecated in Tailscale
 	// 2023-08-09. Should not appear in fresh captures — listed
 	// defensively in case a stale tailnet still emits it.
-	tailcfg.CapabilityWarnFunnelNoHTTPS,
+	nodecap.WarnFunnelNoHTTPS,
 
 	// --- 3. Tailnet-state metadata not derivable from headscale config ---
 
@@ -121,36 +122,36 @@ var unmodelledTailnetStateCaps = []tailcfg.NodeCapability{
 	// from cfg.Domain() that does not round-trip through the
 	// anonymized capture string. Skip rather than diverge on a value
 	// with no real-world equivalent.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrTailnetDisplayName,
+	nodecap.TailnetDisplayName,
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrMaxKeyDuration]: tailnet-wide max key duration
 	// value. Headscale has cfg.Node.Expiry but does not surface it
 	// as a cap today; the hosted control plane emits this only when
 	// a non-default value is configured.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrMaxKeyDuration,
+	nodecap.MaxKeyDuration,
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrNativeIPV4]: peer-consumed cap conditional on
 	// tailnet ipv4 reachability state. Out of scope for the current
 	// peer-cap adoption (only suggest-exit-node is wired in this
 	// PR).
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrNativeIPV4,
+	nodecap.NativeIPV4,
 
 	// --- 4. Internal tuning, no headscale equivalent ---
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrProbeUDPLifetime]: tunes magicsock's UDP
 	// path-lifetime probe behavior. Internal performance knob; not
 	// policy-driven. Client reads via controlknobs:147.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrProbeUDPLifetime,
+	nodecap.ProbeUDPLifetime,
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrSSHBehaviorV1]: configures the embedded SSH
 	// server (no su, in-process SFTP). Internal tuning; the embedded
 	// server picks Tailscale-vendored defaults without the cap.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrSSHBehaviorV1,
+	nodecap.SSHBehaviorV1,
 
 	// [tailcfg.NodeAttrSSHEnvironmentVariables]: gates SendEnv
 	// forwarding in the embedded SSH server. Internal; default chosen
 	// by the server.
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrSSHEnvironmentVariables,
+	nodecap.SSHEnvironmentVariables,
 }
 
 // strippedCapPrefixes lists URL/string prefixes for parameterized or
@@ -172,7 +173,7 @@ func stripUnmodelledTailnetStateCaps(cm tailcfg.NodeCapMap) tailcfg.NodeCapMap {
 	}
 
 	out := maps.Clone(cm)
-	maps.DeleteFunc(out, func(k tailcfg.NodeCapability, _ []tailcfg.RawMessage) bool {
+	maps.DeleteFunc(out, func(k nodecap.Cap, _ []tailcfg.RawMessage) bool {
 		return isUnmodelledTailnetStateCap(k)
 	})
 
@@ -183,7 +184,7 @@ func stripUnmodelledTailnetStateCaps(cm tailcfg.NodeCapMap) tailcfg.NodeCapMap {
 	return out
 }
 
-func isUnmodelledTailnetStateCap(k tailcfg.NodeCapability) bool {
+func isUnmodelledTailnetStateCap(k nodecap.Cap) bool {
 	if slices.Contains(unmodelledTailnetStateCaps, k) {
 		return true
 	}

hscontrol/policy/v2/tailscale_nodeattrs_compat_test.go

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types/testcapture"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/views"
 )
 
@@ -321,7 +322,7 @@ func testNodeAttrsSuccess(
 // capMapFromView materialises a captured CapMap view into the
 // [tailcfg.NodeCapMap] shape headscale renders, so both sides of the
 // diff have the same concrete type.
-func capMapFromView(view views.MapSlice[tailcfg.NodeCapability, tailcfg.RawMessage]) tailcfg.NodeCapMap {
+func capMapFromView(view views.MapSlice[nodecap.Cap, tailcfg.RawMessage]) tailcfg.NodeCapMap {
 	if view.Len() == 0 {
 		return nil
 	}

hscontrol/policy/v2/types.go

@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ import (
 	"go4.org/netipx"
 	"tailscale.com/net/tsaddr"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/views"
 	"tailscale.com/util/multierr"
 	"tailscale.com/util/set"
@@ -99,8 +101,8 @@ var (
 // without the matching server-side machinery would be misleading — nodes
 // would advertise a feature that does not work. Reject at policy load and
 // point operators at the issue.
-var nodeAttrUnsupportedCaps = map[tailcfg.NodeCapability]string{
+var nodeAttrUnsupportedCaps = map[nodecap.Cap]string{
-	tailcfg.NodeAttrFunnel: "https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/2527",
+	nodecap.Funnel: "https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/2527",
 }
 
 // Policy validation errors.
@@ -1892,7 +1894,7 @@ type Grant struct {
 // allocator; the policy compiler does not consume it yet.
 type NodeAttrGrant struct {
 	Targets Aliases        `json:"target"`
-	Attrs   []tailcfg.NodeCapability `json:"attr,omitempty"`
+	Attrs   []nodecap.Cap  `json:"attr,omitempty"`
 	IPPool  []netip.Prefix `json:"ipPool,omitempty"`
 }
 
@@ -2253,7 +2255,7 @@ func validateCapabilityName(name string) error {
 
 	// Reject caps in the tailscale.com domain unless allowlisted.
 	if strings.HasPrefix(name, "tailscale.com/") {
-		if !tailscaleCapAllowlist[tailcfg.PeerCapability(name)] {
+		if !tailscaleCapAllowlist[peercap.Cap(name)] {
 			return ErrCapNameTailscaleDomain
 		}
 	}
@@ -2265,16 +2267,16 @@ func validateCapabilityName(name string) error {
 // that users are allowed to specify in grant app fields. Companion caps
 // (drive-sharer, relay-target) and internal caps (ingress, funnel) are
 // generated by the server and cannot be specified by users.
-var tailscaleCapAllowlist = map[tailcfg.PeerCapability]bool{
+var tailscaleCapAllowlist = map[peercap.Cap]bool{
-	tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive:  true, // tailscale.com/cap/drive
+	peercap.Taildrive:  true, // tailscale.com/cap/drive
-	tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay:      true, // tailscale.com/cap/relay
+	peercap.Relay:      true, // tailscale.com/cap/relay
-	tailcfg.PeerCapabilityWebUI:      true, // tailscale.com/cap/webui
+	peercap.WebUI:      true, // tailscale.com/cap/webui
-	tailcfg.PeerCapabilityKubernetes: true, // tailscale.com/cap/kubernetes
+	peercap.Kubernetes: true, // tailscale.com/cap/kubernetes
-	tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTsIDP:      true, // tailscale.com/cap/tsidp
+	peercap.TsIDP:      true, // tailscale.com/cap/tsidp
 
 	// tailscale.com/cap/secrets is the capability used by setec
 	// (github.com/tailscale/setec); allow it so it can be granted via policy.
-	tailcfg.PeerCapability("tailscale.com/cap/secrets"): true,
+	peercap.Cap("tailscale.com/cap/secrets"): true,
 }
 
 // validateGrantSrcDstCombination validates [Grant]-specific source/destination

hscontrol/servertest/grants_test.go

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/netmap"
 	"tailscale.com/wgengine/filter/filtertype"
 )
@@ -157,13 +158,13 @@ func TestGrantPolicies(t *testing.T) { //nolint:gocyclo
 		for _, m := range nm1.PacketFilter {
 			for _, cm := range m.Caps {
 				switch cm.Cap { //nolint:exhaustive // only checking grant-specific caps
-				case tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive:
+				case peercap.Taildrive:
 					foundDrive = true
-				case tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer:
+				case peercap.TaildriveSharer:
 					foundDriveSharer = true
-				case tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay:
+				case peercap.Relay:
 					foundRelay = true
-				case tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget:
+				case peercap.RelayTarget:
 					foundRelayTarget = true
 				}
 			}
@@ -464,8 +465,8 @@ func TestGrantPolicies(t *testing.T) { //nolint:gocyclo
 
 		for _, m := range nm1.PacketFilter {
 			for _, cm := range m.Caps {
-				if cm.Cap == tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive ||
+				if cm.Cap == peercap.Taildrive ||
-					cm.Cap == tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer {
+					cm.Cap == peercap.TaildriveSharer {
 					foundDriveOrSharer = true
 				}
 			}

hscontrol/servertest/nodeattrs_test.go

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/netmap"
 )
 
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ func reloadPolicy(t *testing.T, srv *servertest.TestServer, pol string) {
 }
 
 // hasCap reports whether the given netmap's self CapMap contains want.
-func hasCap(nm *netmap.NetworkMap, want tailcfg.NodeCapability) bool {
+func hasCap(nm *netmap.NetworkMap, want nodecap.Cap) bool {
 	if nm == nil || !nm.SelfNode.Valid() {
 		return false
 	}
@@ -82,11 +83,11 @@ func TestNodeAttrsDeliverToSelfAndPeer(t *testing.T) {
 
 	c1.WaitForCondition(t, "self randomize-client-port cap on c1", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort)
 		})
 	c2.WaitForCondition(t, "self randomize-client-port cap on c2", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort)
 		})
 
 	// randomize-client-port is not in the peer-consumed allowlist and
@@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsUserTargetIsolated(t *testing.T) {
 
 	a.WaitForCondition(t, "alice gains randomize-client-port", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort)
 		})
 
 	// bob must remain free of the cap; check after alice has converged so we
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsUserTargetIsolated(t *testing.T) {
 	b.WaitForPeers(t, 1, 10*time.Second)
 	nmB := b.Netmap()
 	require.NotNil(t, nmB)
-	assert.False(t, hasCap(nmB, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort),
+	assert.False(t, hasCap(nmB, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort),
 		"bob is not in the target set; must not receive the cap")
 }
 
@@ -154,14 +155,14 @@ func TestNodeAttrsRevokesWhenRemoved(t *testing.T) {
 
 	c.WaitForCondition(t, "captive cap appears", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection)
 		})
 
 	reloadPolicy(t, srv, `{}`)
 
 	c.WaitForCondition(t, "captive cap disappears", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return !hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection)
+			return !hasCap(nm, nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection)
 		})
 }
 
@@ -184,11 +185,11 @@ func TestNodeAttrsBaselineCapsAlwaysOn(t *testing.T) {
 				return false
 			}
 
-			for _, w := range []tailcfg.NodeCapability{
+			for _, w := range []nodecap.Cap{
-				tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin,
+				nodecap.Admin,
-				tailcfg.CapabilitySSH,
+				nodecap.SSH,
-				tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing,
+				nodecap.FileSharing,
-				tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate,
+				nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate,
 			} {
 				if !hasCap(nm, w) {
 					return false
@@ -217,9 +218,9 @@ func TestTaildropDisabledWithholdsFileSharingCap(t *testing.T) {
 				return false
 			}
 
-			return !hasCap(nm, tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing) &&
+			return !hasCap(nm, nodecap.FileSharing) &&
-				hasCap(nm, tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin) &&
+				hasCap(nm, nodecap.Admin) &&
-				hasCap(nm, tailcfg.CapabilitySSH)
+				hasCap(nm, nodecap.SSH)
 		})
 }
 
@@ -247,9 +248,9 @@ func TestNodeAttrsAddsToBaseline(t *testing.T) {
 
 	c.WaitForCondition(t, "policy adds caps on top of baseline", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort) &&
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort) &&
-				hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrDisableCaptivePortalDetection) &&
+				hasCap(nm, nodecap.DisableCaptivePortalDetection) &&
-				hasCap(nm, tailcfg.CapabilitySSH)
+				hasCap(nm, nodecap.SSH)
 		})
 }
 
@@ -276,7 +277,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsReloadingSamePolicyDoesNotChurnSelf(t *testing.T) {
 
 	c.WaitForCondition(t, "policy cap arrives", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort)
 		})
 
 	// Reload identical bytes. Per-node CapMap diff produces an empty
@@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsReloadingSamePolicyDoesNotChurnSelf(t *testing.T) {
 
 	c.WaitForCondition(t, "cap persists after no-op reload", 5*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrRandomizeClientPort)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.RandomizeClientPort)
 		})
 }
 
@@ -352,7 +353,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsSuggestExitNodeOnPeerCapMap(t *testing.T) {
 	// usual stamp; nothing special about exit nodes here).
 	exit.WaitForCondition(t, "self suggest-exit-node on exit", 10*time.Second,
 		func(nm *netmap.NetworkMap) bool {
-			return hasCap(nm, tailcfg.NodeAttrSuggestExitNode)
+			return hasCap(nm, nodecap.SuggestExitNode)
 		})
 
 	// Peer-side: the viewer sees the exit node in its Peers list with
@@ -369,7 +370,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsSuggestExitNodeOnPeerCapMap(t *testing.T) {
 					continue
 				}
 
-				return peer.CapMap().Contains(tailcfg.NodeAttrSuggestExitNode)
+				return peer.CapMap().Contains(nodecap.SuggestExitNode)
 			}
 
 			return false
@@ -389,7 +390,7 @@ func TestNodeAttrsSuggestExitNodeOnPeerCapMap(t *testing.T) {
 					continue
 				}
 
-				return !peer.CapMap().Contains(tailcfg.NodeAttrSuggestExitNode)
+				return !peer.CapMap().Contains(nodecap.SuggestExitNode)
 			}
 
 			return false

hscontrol/types/node.go

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ import (
 	"go4.org/netipx"
 	"tailscale.com/net/tsaddr"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
 	"tailscale.com/types/key"
 	"tailscale.com/types/views"
 	"tailscale.com/util/dnsname"
@@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ type RouteFunc func(id NodeID) []netip.Prefix
 // node's own IPv4 CGNAT prefix in [tailcfg.Node.Addresses] and
 // [tailcfg.Node.AllowedIPs]. Subnet routes the node advertises remain.
 // See https://tailscale.com/docs/reference/troubleshooting/network-configuration/cgnat-conflicts.
-const nodeAttrDisableIPv4 tailcfg.NodeCapability = "disable-ipv4"
+const nodeAttrDisableIPv4 nodecap.Cap = "disable-ipv4"
 
 // filterIPv4 returns ps with every IPv4 prefix dropped. Used by
 // [NodeView.TailNode] when the node carries the disable-ipv4 nodeAttr.
@@ -1200,12 +1201,12 @@ func (nv NodeView) TailNode(
 	// what Tailscale SaaS emits for a default tailnet.
 	// cfg.Taildrop.Enabled gates CapabilityFileSharing.
 	capMap := tailcfg.NodeCapMap{
-		tailcfg.CapabilityAdmin: []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+		nodecap.Admin: []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
-		tailcfg.CapabilitySSH:   []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
+		nodecap.SSH:   []tailcfg.RawMessage{},
 	}
 
 	if cfg.Taildrop.Enabled {
-		capMap[tailcfg.CapabilityFileSharing] = []tailcfg.RawMessage{}
+		capMap[nodecap.FileSharing] = []tailcfg.RawMessage{}
 	}
 
 	// default-auto-update is always emitted; the value is a JSON bool
@@ -1218,7 +1219,7 @@ func (nv NodeView) TailNode(
 		autoUpdateVal = tailcfg.RawMessage("true")
 	}
 
-	capMap[tailcfg.NodeAttrDefaultAutoUpdate] = []tailcfg.RawMessage{autoUpdateVal}
+	capMap[nodecap.DefaultAutoUpdate] = []tailcfg.RawMessage{autoUpdateVal}
 
 	// Policy nodeAttrs overlay the baseline on the self view. Peers
 	// pass nil; their CapMap is replaced downstream by [policyv2.PeerCapMap].

integration/grant_cap_test.go

@@ -14,12 +14,14 @@ import (
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/nodecap"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg/peercap"
 	"tailscale.com/wgengine/filter"
 )
 
 // hasCapMatchInPacketFilter checks if any [filter.Match] entry in the packet
 // filter contains a [filter.CapMatch] with the given capability name.
-func hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf []filter.Match, peerCap tailcfg.PeerCapability) bool {
+func hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf []filter.Match, peerCap peercap.Cap) bool {
 	for _, m := range pf {
 		for _, cm := range m.Caps {
 			if cm.Cap == peerCap {
@@ -34,7 +36,7 @@ func hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf []filter.Match, peerCap tailcfg.PeerCapability
 // hasCapMatchForIP checks if any [filter.CapMatch] with the given capability
 // has a Dst prefix that contains the given IP. This validates that
 // the cap is directed at the correct node, not just present.
-func hasCapMatchForIP(pf []filter.Match, peerCap tailcfg.PeerCapability, ip netip.Addr) bool {
+func hasCapMatchForIP(pf []filter.Match, peerCap peercap.Cap, ip netip.Addr) bool {
 	for _, m := range pf {
 		for _, cm := range m.Caps {
 			if cm.Cap == peerCap && cm.Dst.Contains(ip) {
@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 				Sources:      policyv2.Aliases{tagp("tag:client-a"), tagp("tag:client-b")},
 				Destinations: policyv2.Aliases{tagp("tag:relay")},
 				App: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-					tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay: {tailcfg.RawMessage("{}")},
+					peercap.Relay: {tailcfg.RawMessage("{}")},
 				},
 			},
 		},
@@ -280,7 +282,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := relayR.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay, relayIPv4),
+		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, peercap.Relay, relayIPv4),
 			"Relay R should have cap/relay with Dst matching relay's IP %s", relayIPv4)
 	}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond, "R should have cap/relay targeting its own IP")
 
@@ -288,7 +290,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := clientA.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget, clientAIPv4),
+		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, peercap.RelayTarget, clientAIPv4),
 			"Client A should have cap/relay-target with Dst matching A's IP %s", clientAIPv4)
 	}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond, "A should have cap/relay-target targeting its own IP")
 
@@ -296,7 +298,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := clientB.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget, clientBIPv4),
+		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, peercap.RelayTarget, clientBIPv4),
 			"Client B should have cap/relay-target with Dst matching B's IP %s", clientBIPv4)
 	}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond, "B should have cap/relay-target targeting its own IP")
 
@@ -306,7 +308,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := relayR.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelayTarget),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.RelayTarget),
 			"Relay R should NOT have cap/relay-target")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "R should not have cap/relay-target")
 
@@ -314,7 +316,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := clientA.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.Relay),
 			"Client A should NOT have cap/relay")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "A should not have cap/relay")
 
@@ -322,7 +324,7 @@ func TestGrantCapRelay(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := clientB.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityRelay),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.Relay),
 			"Client B should NOT have cap/relay")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "B should not have cap/relay")
 
@@ -560,9 +562,9 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 		NodeAttrs: []policyv2.NodeAttrGrant{
 			{
 				Targets: policyv2.Aliases{policyv2.Wildcard},
-				Attrs: []tailcfg.NodeCapability{
+				Attrs: []nodecap.Cap{
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveShare,
+					nodecap.TaildriveShare,
-					tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess,
+					nodecap.TaildriveAccess,
 				},
 			},
 		},
@@ -586,7 +588,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 				Sources:      policyv2.Aliases{tagp("tag:rw-client")},
 				Destinations: policyv2.Aliases{tagp("tag:sharer")},
 				App: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-					tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive: {
+					peercap.Taildrive: {
 						tailcfg.RawMessage(`{"shares":["*"],"access":"rw"}`),
 					},
 				},
@@ -596,7 +598,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 				Sources:      policyv2.Aliases{tagp("tag:ro-client")},
 				Destinations: policyv2.Aliases{tagp("tag:sharer")},
 				App: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
-					tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive: {
+					peercap.Taildrive: {
 						tailcfg.RawMessage(`{"shares":["*"],"access":"ro"}`),
 					},
 				},
@@ -723,9 +725,9 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 				"%s: SelfNode should be valid", node.Hostname())
 
 			if nm.SelfNode.Valid() {
-				assert.True(c, nm.SelfNode.HasCap(tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveShare),
+				assert.True(c, nm.SelfNode.HasCap(nodecap.TaildriveShare),
 					"%s: should have drive:share cap", node.Hostname())
-				assert.True(c, nm.SelfNode.HasCap(tailcfg.NodeAttrsTaildriveAccess),
+				assert.True(c, nm.SelfNode.HasCap(nodecap.TaildriveAccess),
 					"%s: should have drive:access cap", node.Hostname())
 			}
 		}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond,
@@ -741,7 +743,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := sharer.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive, sharerIPv4),
+		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, peercap.Taildrive, sharerIPv4),
 			"Sharer should have cap/drive with Dst matching sharer's IP %s", sharerIPv4)
 	}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond, "sharer should have cap/drive targeting its own IP")
 
@@ -751,7 +753,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := rwClient.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer, rwClientIPv4),
+		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, peercap.TaildriveSharer, rwClientIPv4),
 			"RW client should have cap/drive-sharer with Dst matching rw-client's IP %s", rwClientIPv4)
 	}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond, "rw-client should have cap/drive-sharer")
 
@@ -761,7 +763,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := roClient.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer, roClientIPv4),
+		assert.True(c, hasCapMatchForIP(pf, peercap.TaildriveSharer, roClientIPv4),
 			"RO client should have cap/drive-sharer with Dst matching ro-client's IP %s", roClientIPv4)
 	}, assertTimeout, 500*time.Millisecond, "ro-client should have cap/drive-sharer")
 
@@ -771,9 +773,9 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := noAccess.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.Taildrive),
 			"no-access should NOT have cap/drive")
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.TaildriveSharer),
 			"no-access should NOT have cap/drive-sharer")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "no-access should have no drive caps")
 
@@ -781,7 +783,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := sharer.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildriveSharer),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.TaildriveSharer),
 			"sharer should NOT have cap/drive-sharer")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "sharer should not have cap/drive-sharer")
 
@@ -789,7 +791,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := rwClient.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.Taildrive),
 			"rw-client should NOT have cap/drive")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "rw-client should not have cap/drive")
 
@@ -797,7 +799,7 @@ func TestGrantCapDrive(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
 		pf, err := roClient.PacketFilter()
 		assert.NoError(c, err)
-		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, tailcfg.PeerCapabilityTaildrive),
+		assert.False(c, hasCapMatchInPacketFilter(pf, peercap.Taildrive),
 			"ro-client should NOT have cap/drive")
 	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "ro-client should not have cap/drive")