Fix typo in comment about fsnotify behavior
Some checks failed
Build / build-nix (push) Has been cancelled
Build / build-cross (GOARCH=amd64 GOOS=darwin) (push) Has been cancelled
Build / build-cross (GOARCH=amd64 GOOS=linux) (push) Has been cancelled
Build / build-cross (GOARCH=arm64 GOOS=darwin) (push) Has been cancelled
Build / build-cross (GOARCH=arm64 GOOS=linux) (push) Has been cancelled
Check Generated Files / check-generated (push) Has been cancelled
NixOS Module Tests / nix-module-check (push) Has been cancelled
Tests / test (push) Has been cancelled
Needs More Info - Timer / remove-label-on-response (push) Has been cancelled
Needs More Info - Timer / close-stale (push) Has been cancelled
Close inactive issues / close-issues (push) Has been cancelled

Correct loose (opposite of tight) to lose (opposite of keep).
This commit is contained in:
QEDeD
2026-02-27 15:02:28 +01:00
committed by nblock
parent 0f12e414a6
commit 414d3bbbd8

View File

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ func (e *ExtraRecordsMan) Run() {
e.updateRecords()
// If a file is removed or renamed, fsnotify will loose track of it
// If a file is removed or renamed, fsnotify will lose track of it
// and not watch it. We will therefore attempt to re-add it with a backoff.
case fsnotify.Remove, fsnotify.Rename:
_, err := backoff.Retry(context.Background(), func() (struct{}, error) {