mirror of
https://github.com/juanfont/headscale.git
synced 2026-07-07 16:40:21 +09:00
change: drop subnet-router full update, use policy change
Don't send a full update when a subnet router goes up or down; the gated policy change already recomputes peers and is a smaller payload. Updates #3293
This commit is contained in:
@@ -166,3 +166,51 @@ func TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterForcesRecompute(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"subnet router disconnect must force a peer recompute")
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterEmitsPolicyChangeNotFull pins how a subnet
|
||||
// router forces that recompute: through the gated change.PolicyChange() (a
|
||||
// runtime peer recompute) and the lightweight online/offline peer patch, not a
|
||||
// full update. policyChangeResponse is a strict subset of a full update yet
|
||||
// still carries primary-route failover, so the heavier FullUpdate that the
|
||||
// online/offline change once emitted for subnet routers is unnecessary.
|
||||
func TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterEmitsPolicyChangeNotFull(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
_, s, nodeID := persistTestSetup(t)
|
||||
t.Cleanup(func() { _ = s.Close() })
|
||||
|
||||
route := netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24")
|
||||
_, ok := s.nodeStore.UpdateNode(nodeID, func(n *types.Node) {
|
||||
n.Hostinfo = &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{route}}
|
||||
n.ApprovedRoutes = []netip.Prefix{route}
|
||||
})
|
||||
require.True(t, ok)
|
||||
|
||||
assertRecomputeNotFull := func(t *testing.T, cs []change.Change) {
|
||||
t.Helper()
|
||||
|
||||
assert.NotEmpty(t, runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs),
|
||||
"subnet router must still drive a runtime peer recompute")
|
||||
assert.True(t, hasPeerPatch(cs),
|
||||
"subnet router should still emit the lightweight online/offline patch")
|
||||
|
||||
for _, c := range cs {
|
||||
assert.Falsef(t, c.IsFull(),
|
||||
"subnet router recompute must be a PolicyChange, not a full update: %q", c.Reason)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("connect", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
cs, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
|
||||
require.NotZero(t, epoch)
|
||||
|
||||
assertRecomputeNotFull(t, cs)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("disconnect", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
_, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
|
||||
|
||||
cs, err := s.Disconnect(nodeID, epoch)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
assertRecomputeNotFull(t, cs)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -456,29 +456,19 @@ func NodeRemoved(id types.NodeID) Change {
|
||||
return PeersRemoved(id)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// NodeOnlineFor returns a [Change] for when a node comes online.
|
||||
// If the node is a subnet router, a full update is sent instead of a patch.
|
||||
// NodeOnlineFor returns the [Change] for a node coming online: a lightweight
|
||||
// [NodeOnline] peer patch. Subnet routers, relay targets, and via targets get
|
||||
// their full peer recompute from the gated [PolicyChange] that State.Connect
|
||||
// emits, so no full update is needed here.
|
||||
func NodeOnlineFor(node types.NodeView) Change {
|
||||
if node.IsSubnetRouter() {
|
||||
c := FullUpdate()
|
||||
c.Reason = "subnet router online"
|
||||
|
||||
return c
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NodeOnline(node.ID())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// NodeOfflineFor returns a [Change] for when a node goes offline.
|
||||
// If the node is a subnet router, a full update is sent instead of a patch.
|
||||
// NodeOfflineFor returns the [Change] for a node going offline: a lightweight
|
||||
// [NodeOffline] peer patch. As with [NodeOnlineFor], subnet routers and other
|
||||
// recompute-forcing nodes rely on the gated [PolicyChange] from State.Disconnect
|
||||
// for the peer recompute, so no full update is needed here.
|
||||
func NodeOfflineFor(node types.NodeView) Change {
|
||||
if node.IsSubnetRouter() {
|
||||
c := FullUpdate()
|
||||
c.Reason = "subnet router offline"
|
||||
|
||||
return c
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NodeOffline(node.ID())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
|
||||
package change
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"net/netip"
|
||||
"reflect"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -612,3 +614,42 @@ func TestUniqueNodeIDs(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestNodeOnlineOfflineForSubnetRouter(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
route := netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24")
|
||||
router := types.Node{
|
||||
ID: 1,
|
||||
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{route}},
|
||||
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{route},
|
||||
}
|
||||
view := router.View()
|
||||
require.True(t, view.IsSubnetRouter(), "test node must be a subnet router")
|
||||
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
got Change
|
||||
wantOnline bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{name: "online", got: NodeOnlineFor(view), wantOnline: true},
|
||||
{name: "offline", got: NodeOfflineFor(view), wantOnline: false},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, tt := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// A subnet router's online/offline transition rides the lightweight
|
||||
// peer patch, not a full update: the gated PolicyChange that
|
||||
// State.Connect/Disconnect emit owns the netmap recompute.
|
||||
assert.False(t, tt.got.IsFull(),
|
||||
"subnet router online/offline must be a peer patch, not a full update")
|
||||
|
||||
require.NotEmpty(t, tt.got.PeerPatches,
|
||||
"expected an online/offline peer patch")
|
||||
|
||||
patch := tt.got.PeerPatches[0]
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, view.ID().NodeID(), patch.NodeID)
|
||||
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, patch.Online)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tt.wantOnline, *patch.Online)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user