Files
headscale/hscontrol/policy/policyutil/reduce_test.go
T
Kristoffer Dalby 4933bb83d2 policyutil: match DstPorts as ranges when reducing filters
Every node re-parsed every entry into an IPSet on every policy change;
under churn that was most of the batcher's CPU.
2026-10-23 18:23:53 +02:00

1417 lines
33 KiB
Go
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
package policyutil_test
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"net/netip"
"testing"
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy/policyutil"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/util"
"github.com/rs/zerolog/log"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"tailscale.com/net/tsaddr"
"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
"tailscale.com/util/must"
)
var ap = func(ipStr string) *netip.Addr {
ip := netip.MustParseAddr(ipStr)
return &ip
}
var p = func(prefStr string) netip.Prefix {
ip := netip.MustParsePrefix(prefStr)
return ip
}
// hsExitNodeDestForTest is the list of destination IP ranges that are allowed when
// we use headscale "autogroup:internet".
var hsExitNodeDestForTest = []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "0.0.0.0/5", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "8.0.0.0/7", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "11.0.0.0/8", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "12.0.0.0/6", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "16.0.0.0/4", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "32.0.0.0/3", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "64.0.0.0/3", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "96.0.0.0/6", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "100.0.0.0/10", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "100.128.0.0/9", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "101.0.0.0/8", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "102.0.0.0/7", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "104.0.0.0/5", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "112.0.0.0/4", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "128.0.0.0/3", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "160.0.0.0/5", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "168.0.0.0/8", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.0.0.0/9", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.128.0.0/10", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.192.0.0/11", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.224.0.0/12", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.240.0.0/13", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.248.0.0/14", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.252.0.0/15", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "169.255.0.0/16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "170.0.0.0/7", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "172.0.0.0/12", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "172.32.0.0/11", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "172.64.0.0/10", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "172.128.0.0/9", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "173.0.0.0/8", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "174.0.0.0/7", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "176.0.0.0/4", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.0.0.0/9", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.128.0.0/11", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.160.0.0/13", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.169.0.0/16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.170.0.0/15", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.172.0.0/14", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.176.0.0/12", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "192.192.0.0/10", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "193.0.0.0/8", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "194.0.0.0/7", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "196.0.0.0/6", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "200.0.0.0/5", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "208.0.0.0/4", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "224.0.0.0/3", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
{IP: "2000::/3", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
}
func TestTheInternet(t *testing.T) {
internetSet := util.TheInternet()
internetPrefs := internetSet.Prefixes()
for i := range internetPrefs {
if internetPrefs[i].String() != hsExitNodeDestForTest[i].IP {
t.Errorf(
"prefix from internet set %q != hsExit list %q",
internetPrefs[i].String(),
hsExitNodeDestForTest[i].IP,
)
}
}
if len(internetPrefs) != len(hsExitNodeDestForTest) {
t.Fatalf(
"expected same length of prefixes, internet: %d, hsExit: %d",
len(internetPrefs),
len(hsExitNodeDestForTest),
)
}
}
func TestReduceFilterRules(t *testing.T) {
users := types.Users{
types.User{ID: 1, Name: "mickael"},
types.User{ID: 2, Name: "user1"},
types.User{ID: 3, Name: "user2"},
types.User{ID: 4, Name: "user100"},
types.User{ID: 5, Name: "user3"},
}
tests := []struct {
name string
node *types.Node
peers types.Nodes
pol string
want []tailcfg.FilterRule
}{
{
name: "host1-can-reach-host2-no-rules",
pol: `
{
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"100.64.0.1"
],
"dst": [
"100.64.0.2:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0:ab12:4843:2222:6273:2221"),
User: new(users[0]),
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0:ab12:4843:2222:6273:2222"),
User: new(users[0]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{},
},
{
name: "1604-subnet-routers-are-preserved",
pol: `
{
"groups": {
"group:admins": [
"user1@"
]
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:admins"
],
"dst": [
"group:admins:*"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:admins"
],
"dst": [
"10.33.0.0/16:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
// Merged: Both ACL rules combined (same SrcIPs)
{
SrcIPs: []string{
"100.64.0.1-100.64.0.2",
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1-fd7a:115c:a1e0::2",
},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{
IP: "100.64.0.1",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "fd7a:115c:a1e0::1",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "10.33.0.0/16",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "1786-reducing-breaks-exit-nodes-the-client",
pol: `
{
"groups": {
"group:team": [
"user3@",
"user2@",
"user1@"
]
},
"hosts": {
"internal": "100.64.0.100/32"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"internal:*"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"autogroup:internet:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[2]),
},
// "internal" exit node
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.100"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::100"),
User: new(users[3]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{},
},
{
name: "1786-reducing-breaks-exit-nodes-the-exit",
pol: `
{
"groups": {
"group:team": [
"user3@",
"user2@",
"user1@"
]
},
"hosts": {
"internal": "100.64.0.100/32"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"internal:*"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"autogroup:internet:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.100"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::100"),
User: new(users[3]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[2]),
},
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
// Only the internal:* rule generates filters.
// autogroup:internet does NOT generate packet filters - it's handled
// by exit node routing via AllowedIPs, not by packet filtering.
{
SrcIPs: []string{
"100.64.0.1-100.64.0.2",
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1-fd7a:115c:a1e0::2",
},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{
IP: "100.64.0.100",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "1786-reducing-breaks-exit-nodes-the-example-from-issue",
pol: `
{
"groups": {
"group:team": [
"user3@",
"user2@",
"user1@"
]
},
"hosts": {
"internal": "100.64.0.100/32"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"internal:*"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"0.0.0.0/5:*",
"8.0.0.0/7:*",
"11.0.0.0/8:*",
"12.0.0.0/6:*",
"16.0.0.0/4:*",
"32.0.0.0/3:*",
"64.0.0.0/2:*",
"128.0.0.0/3:*",
"160.0.0.0/5:*",
"168.0.0.0/6:*",
"172.0.0.0/12:*",
"172.32.0.0/11:*",
"172.64.0.0/10:*",
"172.128.0.0/9:*",
"173.0.0.0/8:*",
"174.0.0.0/7:*",
"176.0.0.0/4:*",
"192.0.0.0/9:*",
"192.128.0.0/11:*",
"192.160.0.0/13:*",
"192.169.0.0/16:*",
"192.170.0.0/15:*",
"192.172.0.0/14:*",
"192.176.0.0/12:*",
"192.192.0.0/10:*",
"193.0.0.0/8:*",
"194.0.0.0/7:*",
"196.0.0.0/6:*",
"200.0.0.0/5:*",
"208.0.0.0/4:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.100"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::100"),
User: new(users[3]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[2]),
},
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
// Exit routes (0.0.0.0/0, ::/0) are skipped when checking RoutableIPs
// overlap, matching Tailscale SaaS behavior. Only destinations that
// contain the node's own Tailscale IP (via InIPSet) are kept.
// Here, 64.0.0.0/2 contains 100.64.0.100 (CGNAT range), so it matches.
{
SrcIPs: []string{
"100.64.0.1-100.64.0.2",
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1-fd7a:115c:a1e0::2",
},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{
IP: "100.64.0.100",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{IP: "64.0.0.0/2", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "1786-reducing-breaks-exit-nodes-app-connector-like",
pol: `
{
"groups": {
"group:team": [
"user3@",
"user2@",
"user1@"
]
},
"hosts": {
"internal": "100.64.0.100/32"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"internal:*"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"8.0.0.0/8:*",
"16.0.0.0/8:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.100"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::100"),
User: new(users[3]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("8.0.0.0/16"), netip.MustParsePrefix("16.0.0.0/16")},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("8.0.0.0/16"), netip.MustParsePrefix("16.0.0.0/16")},
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[2]),
},
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
// Merged: Both ACL rules combined (same SrcIPs)
{
SrcIPs: []string{
"100.64.0.1-100.64.0.2",
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1-fd7a:115c:a1e0::2",
},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{
IP: "100.64.0.100",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "8.0.0.0/8",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "16.0.0.0/8",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "1786-reducing-breaks-exit-nodes-app-connector-like2",
pol: `
{
"groups": {
"group:team": [
"user3@",
"user2@",
"user1@"
]
},
"hosts": {
"internal": "100.64.0.100/32"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"internal:*"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:team"
],
"dst": [
"8.0.0.0/16:*",
"16.0.0.0/16:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.100"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::100"),
User: new(users[3]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("8.0.0.0/8"), netip.MustParsePrefix("16.0.0.0/8")},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("8.0.0.0/8"), netip.MustParsePrefix("16.0.0.0/8")},
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[2]),
},
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
// Merged: Both ACL rules combined (same SrcIPs)
{
SrcIPs: []string{
"100.64.0.1-100.64.0.2",
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1-fd7a:115c:a1e0::2",
},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{
IP: "100.64.0.100",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "8.0.0.0/16",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "16.0.0.0/16",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "1817-reduce-breaks-32-mask",
pol: `
{
"tagOwners": {
"tag:access-servers": ["user100@"],
},
"groups": {
"group:access": [
"user1@"
]
},
"hosts": {
"dns1": "172.16.0.21/32",
"vlan1": "172.16.0.0/24"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"proto": "",
"src": [
"group:access"
],
"dst": [
"tag:access-servers:*",
"dns1:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.100"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::100"),
User: new(users[3]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/24")},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/24")},
Tags: []string{"tag:access-servers"},
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{
"100.64.0.1",
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1",
},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{
IP: "100.64.0.100",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "fd7a:115c:a1e0::100",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
{
IP: "172.16.0.21",
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "2365-only-route-policy",
pol: `
{
"hosts": {
"router": "100.64.0.1/32",
"node": "100.64.0.2/32"
},
"acls": [
{
"action": "accept",
"src": [
"*"
],
"dst": [
"router:8000"
]
},
{
"action": "accept",
"src": [
"node"
],
"dst": [
"172.26.0.0/16:*"
]
}
],
}
`,
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.2"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2"),
User: new(users[3]),
},
peers: types.Nodes{
&types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
User: new(users[1]),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{p("172.16.0.0/24"), p("10.10.11.0/24"), p("10.10.12.0/24")},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{p("172.16.0.0/24"), p("10.10.11.0/24"), p("10.10.12.0/24")},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
for idx, pmf := range policy.PolicyManagerFuncsForTest(
[]byte(tt.pol),
) {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%s-index%d", tt.name, idx), func(t *testing.T) {
var (
pm policy.PolicyManager
err error
)
pm, err = pmf(users, append(tt.peers, tt.node).ViewSlice())
require.NoError(t, err)
got, _ := pm.Filter()
t.Logf("full filter:\n%s", must.Get(json.MarshalIndent(got, "", " ")))
got = policyutil.ReduceFilterRules(tt.node.View(), got)
if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.want, got); diff != "" {
log.Trace().Interface("got", got).Msg("result")
t.Errorf("TestReduceFilterRules() unexpected result (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}
})
}
}
}
// TestReduceFilterRulesPartialApproval verifies that ReduceFilterRules
// only preserves filter rules for routes that are both advertised
// (RoutableIPs) AND approved (ApprovedRoutes), matching Tailscale
// SaaS behavior. Advertised-but-unapproved routes do not cause rule
// preservation: SaaS never generates filter rules for unapproved
// routes, and headscale consults node.SubnetRoutes() (which filters
// by approval) rather than Hostinfo.RoutableIPs() (which does not).
func TestReduceFilterRulesPartialApproval(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
node *types.Node
rules []tailcfg.FilterRule
wantCount int
wantRoutes []string
}{
{
name: "approved-route-included",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "10.33.0.0/16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
},
wantCount: 1,
wantRoutes: []string{"10.33.0.0/16"},
},
{
name: "unapproved-route-excluded",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
// Advertised but NOT approved:
netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/24"),
},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
// Only 10.33.0.0/16 approved
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
// Targets the unapproved route
{IP: "172.16.0.0/24", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
},
// SubnetRoutes() does NOT contain 172.16.0.0/24
// (only approved routes), and the ACL dst does not
// overlap the node's own IPs, so the rule is
// dropped. This matches Tailscale SaaS behavior.
wantCount: 0,
},
{
name: "neither-advertised-nor-approved-excluded",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
// Not advertised, not approved
{IP: "192.168.0.0/16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
},
wantCount: 0,
},
{
// Tailscale SaaS delivers every rule to an approved exit
// node: its exit routes contain every destination.
name: "approved-exit-route-includes-tailnet-host",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes()},
ApprovedRoutes: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"100.64.0.17"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "100.64.0.16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRange{First: 53, Last: 53}},
{IP: "fd7a:115c:a1e0::10", Ports: tailcfg.PortRange{First: 53, Last: 53}},
},
},
},
wantCount: 1,
wantRoutes: []string{"100.64.0.16", "fd7a:115c:a1e0::10"},
},
{
name: "approved-exit-route-includes-private-subnet",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes()},
ApprovedRoutes: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"100.64.0.17"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "10.33.0.0/16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
},
wantCount: 1,
wantRoutes: []string{"10.33.0.0/16"},
},
{
name: "unapproved-exit-route-excluded",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes()},
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"100.64.0.17"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "100.64.0.16", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
},
wantCount: 0,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := policyutil.ReduceFilterRules(
tt.node.View(), tt.rules,
)
require.Len(t, got, tt.wantCount,
"rule count mismatch")
if tt.wantCount > 0 {
var gotRoutes []string
for _, dp := range got[0].DstPorts {
gotRoutes = append(gotRoutes, dp.IP)
}
require.Equal(t, tt.wantRoutes, gotRoutes)
}
})
}
}
// TestReduceFilterRulesCapGrant tests the CapGrant branch of
// ReduceFilterRules, which was previously untested. All existing
// test cases use ACL-only policies with DstPorts rules.
func TestReduceFilterRulesCapGrant(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
node *types.Node
rules []tailcfg.FilterRule
want []tailcfg.FilterRule
}{
{
name: "capgrant-matches-node-ip-narrowed",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// Broad IPv4 prefix containing node IP
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/10"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// Only IPv4 narrowed (IPv6 not in /10)
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "capgrant-no-match-filtered-out",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// Different IP — doesn't match this node
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.99/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{},
},
{
name: "capgrant-with-subnet-route-overlap",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/16"),
},
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// Subnet route overlap
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/8"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/relay-target": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// 10.0.0.0/8 doesn't contain node's
// CGNAT IP (100.64.0.1), so no IP
// narrowing. Only route overlap kept
// as original prefix.
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/8"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/relay-target": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "capgrant-exit-route-skipped",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
ApprovedRoutes: tsaddr.ExitRoutes(),
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// 0.0.0.0/0 overlaps the exit route
// but exit routes should be skipped
netip.MustParsePrefix("0.0.0.0/0"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
// Node IP narrowed (0.0.0.0/0
// contains the node's IP)
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "mixed-dstports-and-capgrant-rules",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
// DstPorts rule that matches
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "100.64.0.1", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
{
// CapGrant rule that matches
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
{
// CapGrant rule that doesn't match
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.99/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
DstPorts: []tailcfg.NetPortRange{
{IP: "100.64.0.1", Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny},
},
},
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
// Third rule filtered out — doesn't match node
},
},
{
name: "capgrant-ipv4-only-node",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
// IPv6 is nil, single-IP node
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "capgrant-zero-ip-node-no-panic",
node: &types.Node{
// Both IPv4 and IPv6 are nil, zero IPs.
// Must not panic.
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/drive-sharer": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{},
},
{
// A broad prefix that both contains the node IP (/32 narrow)
// and overlaps one of its approved subnet routes (route
// preserved) would otherwise be emitted twice.
name: "capgrant-ip-and-route-overlap-dedup",
node: &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/24"),
},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/24"),
},
},
rules: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/24"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/relay-target": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
want: []tailcfg.FilterRule{
{
SrcIPs: []string{"*"},
CapGrant: []tailcfg.CapGrant{
{
Dsts: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/24"),
},
CapMap: tailcfg.PeerCapMap{
"tailscale.com/cap/relay-target": nil,
},
},
},
},
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := policyutil.ReduceFilterRules(tt.node.View(), tt.rules)
require.Len(t, got, len(tt.want),
"rule count mismatch")
for i := range tt.want {
require.Equal(t, tt.want[i].SrcIPs, got[i].SrcIPs,
"rule[%d] SrcIPs", i)
require.Len(t, got[i].DstPorts, len(tt.want[i].DstPorts),
"rule[%d] DstPorts count", i)
require.Len(t, got[i].CapGrant, len(tt.want[i].CapGrant),
"rule[%d] CapGrant count", i)
for j := range tt.want[i].CapGrant {
require.ElementsMatch(t,
tt.want[i].CapGrant[j].Dsts,
got[i].CapGrant[j].Dsts,
"rule[%d].CapGrant[%d] Dsts", i, j,
)
}
}
})
}
}
// TestReduceFilterRulesDestForms reduces one rule holding every DstPorts form
// for a node at 100.64.0.1 routing 10.0.0.0/24, and pins which entries reach
// it. Malformed entries fail closed.
func TestReduceFilterRulesDestForms(t *testing.T) {
node := &types.Node{
IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"),
IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"),
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{p("10.0.0.0/24")},
},
ApprovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{p("10.0.0.0/24")},
}
dsts := map[string]bool{
"*": true,
"100.64.0.1": true,
"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1": true,
"100.64.0.2": false,
"100.64.0.0/10": true,
"100.128.0.0/10": false,
"10.0.0.128/25": true,
"10.0.1.0/24": false,
"100.64.0.0-100.64.0.9": true,
"100.64.0.2-100.64.0.9": false,
"10.0.0.200-10.0.1.5": true,
"100.64.0.1/10": false, // host bits set
"100.64.0.9-100.64.0.1": false, // reversed range
"100.64.0.1-fd7a:115c::1": false, // mixed families
"not-an-ip": false,
"100.64.0.1-100.64.0.2-100": false,
}
rule := tailcfg.FilterRule{SrcIPs: []string{"*"}}
for dst := range dsts {
rule.DstPorts = append(rule.DstPorts, tailcfg.NetPortRange{IP: dst, Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny})
}
got := policyutil.ReduceFilterRules(node.View(), []tailcfg.FilterRule{rule})
require.Len(t, got, 1)
kept := make(map[string]bool)
for _, dp := range got[0].DstPorts {
kept[dp.IP] = true
}
for dst, want := range dsts {
require.Equal(t, want, kept[dst], "DstPorts %q", dst)
}
}
// TestReduceFilterRulesAllocsIndependentOfDests reduces the global filter as
// every node does on every policy change. Its DstPorts are plain strings, so
// anything allocated per entry, such as building an IPSet to test one
// address, is paid nodes × entries times per change.
func TestReduceFilterRulesAllocsIndependentOfDests(t *testing.T) {
node := (&types.Node{IPv4: ap("100.64.0.1"), IPv6: ap("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1")}).View()
allocs := func(n int) int {
rule := tailcfg.FilterRule{SrcIPs: []string{"*"}}
for i := range n {
rule.DstPorts = append(rule.DstPorts, tailcfg.NetPortRange{
IP: fmt.Sprintf("100.64.%d.%d", i/250, i%250+2),
Ports: tailcfg.PortRangeAny,
})
}
rules := []tailcfg.FilterRule{rule}
return int(testing.AllocsPerRun(10, func() { policyutil.ReduceFilterRules(node, rules) }))
}
require.Equal(t, allocs(10), allocs(1000),
"reducing a filter must not allocate per DstPorts entry")
}